Supplier Decision War Room™

Demo Workflow

Procurement Decision Review™

Compare suppliers, test decision priorities and generate an explainable procurement recommendation.

Demo narrative: Use this workspace to show how Decivra compares suppliers, evaluates total cost of risk and explains why the recommended supplier is not always the lowest-price option.

Procurement scenarios

Select a live procurement decision

Decision Type

Procurement

Business Unit

Wireline Manufacturing

Decision Name

Critical Electronics Supplier Selection

Decision Value

£1.70M

Deadline

12 Jul 2026

Owner

L. Bianchi

Executive recommendation

NordTech Electronics · Recommended with Conditions

Supplier B (NordTech Electronics) provides the strongest risk-adjusted outcome despite not being the cheapest supplier. Lead time, quality and compliance outweigh the £140k cost delta versus Supplier A.

Decision Confidence™

84%

Decision DNA™

81%

Section 01

Supplier Comparison

Three qualified suppliers evaluated across quality, compliance, dependency and cost of risk.

Supplier A

VoltEdge Components

Quoted

£1.48M

Lead time

9 weeks

Quality

Medium

Compliance

Pending

Dependency

High

Total risk

68/100

Not Recommended

Lowest price but creates concentration and compliance risk.

Supplier B

NordTech Electronics

Quoted

£1.62M

Lead time

7 weeks

Quality

Strong

Compliance

Approved

Dependency

Medium

Total risk

34/100

Recommended with Conditions

Best risk-adjusted supplier despite not being cheapest.

Supplier C

Helix MicroSystems

Quoted

£1.71M

Lead time

5 weeks

Quality

Unknown

Compliance

Approved

Dependency

Medium

Total risk

52/100

Conditional

Fastest option but quality history is insufficient for critical components.

Supplier	Quoted	Lead	Quality	Compliance	Dependency	Decivra
VoltEdge Components Supplier A · Rank 3	£1.48M	9w	Medium	Pending	High	Not Recommended
NordTech Electronics Supplier B · Rank 1	£1.62M	7w	Strong	Approved	Medium	Recommended with Conditions
Helix MicroSystems Supplier C · Rank 2	£1.71M	5w	Unknown	Approved	Medium	Conditional

Section 02

Live Supplier Ranking

Ranking updates as scenario and What-If priorities change.

1
NordTech Electronics
£1.62M · 7w lead · Strong quality
Score
104
2
Helix MicroSystems
£1.71M · 5w lead · Unknown quality
Score
55
3
VoltEdge Components
£1.48M · 9w lead · Medium quality
Score
24

Section 03

Procurement Committee Readiness

Cross-functional sign-off status for this decision.

Procurement
Ready
Finance
FX review pending
Engineering
Quality certificates required
Legal
Penalty terms pending
Operations
Delivery window acceptable

Section 04

Total Cost & Risk Breakdown

Quoted cost

£1.62M

Delay risk

£110k

Quality risk

£65k

Compliance risk

£40k

Concentration risk

£95k

Expected total cost of risk

£1.93M

Section 05

Top Procurement Risks

Supplier A creates high dependency risk (62% of critical electronics spend)

High severity

Supplier C has insufficient quality history for safety-critical use

Medium severity

Supplier B requires delivery penalty clarification

Medium severity

FX exposure requires Finance review

Medium severity

Dual-source strategy not yet approved

High severity

Section 06

Required Actions

1Confirm Supplier B delivery penalty terms
2Request updated quality certificates
3Validate FX exposure with Finance
4Confirm second-source contingency
5Obtain procurement committee approval

Section 07

Decision Replay™

Similar procurement decisions from the last 36 months.

2024
Electronics Board Supplier Switch
Negative precedent
Lowest-price supplier caused an 11-week delay
2025
Detector Assembly Procurement
Positive precedent
Approved supplier delivered at 98.7% on-time
2023
Cable Head Component Purchase
Cautionary precedent
Single-source dependency triggered contract penalty exposure

Section 08

Procurement What-If Simulator

Shift procurement priorities and watch ranking and recommendation evolve.

Live recommendation

NordTech Electronics

Confidence™

84%

DNA™

81%

Risk

46%

Expected cost of risk

£1.93M

Applied priorities

Baseline

Section 09

Ask Decivra

Suggested questions from the procurement committee.

Procurement Decision Review™ is a future Decivra workflow. The MVP begins with RFQ Decision Review™ and expands into supplier, procurement and capital decision workflows.

Humans decide. Decivra prepares. Decivra prepares the evidence, recommendation and required actions. The final decision remains with accountable business leaders.

Agent Review Panel

Specialist review lanes

Each agent reviews the decision from its own discipline. Findings and escalations are auditable.

8 lanes

Commercial Agent
Cost delta £140k is offset by £205k of expected delay/quality risk.
Conf.
84%
Engineering Agent
Supplier B first-article inspection plan approved.
Conf.
86%
Finance AgentEscalation
FX exposure requires treasury validation.
Conf.
72%
Legal AgentEscalation
Delivery penalty clause on Supplier B pending clarification.
Conf.
66%
Operations Agent
Delivery window inside programme critical path.
Conf.
85%
Knowledge Agent
Three procurement precedents matched via Decision Replay™.
Conf.
88%
Challenge AgentEscalation
Recommendation depends on penalty and quality certificate closure.
Conf.
68%
Chief Decision Agent
Recommended with Conditions — five actions must clear before award.
Conf.
82%

Challenge Agent Summary

Supplier B is recommended, but the approval depends on delivery penalty clarification and quality certificate validation. If either fails, dual-sourcing should be required.

Hidden assumption: penalty clause negotiable within window
Failure path: quality certificate slippage delays first-article
Unverified dependency: FX cover confirmed by treasury
Evidence gap: two supplier reference checks still open

Most Likely Failure Scenario

Failure path: Lowest-cost supplier is selected, compliance approval slips, and delivery delay creates production downtime.
Trigger: Compliance audit closure exceeds 6 weeks against programme need.
Business impact: 8–11 week programme delay and £180–£220k expected delay cost.
Prevention: Select Supplier B with conditions and confirm penalty terms before committee approval.

Humans decide. Decivra prepares. Decivra prepares the supplier evidence, risk-adjusted ranking and required actions. The final award decision remains with the procurement committee.

Data Privacy Guardrails

Each customer workspace is isolated. Uploaded RFQs, pricing sheets, contracts and project documents are processed inside the customer’s dedicated environment and are not used to train external language models.

Dedicated workspaceCustomer data isolationNo external model trainingAudit trail retainedExport controlled by roles

Illustrative demo data · not real customer data